Are Infinite Explanations Self-Explanatory?

Consider an infinite series whose items are each explained by their immediate successor. Does such explanation explain the whole or does it leave something to be explained? Hume arguably claimed that fully series. Leibniz, however, designed a very telling objection against this claim, involving of book copies. In paper, I argue Humean claim can, in certain cases, saved from Leibnizian “infinite copies” objection, and provides interesting way defuse some cosmological arguments for existence God give non-theistic but complete Universe. course my argumentation, also show circular explanations can “self-explanatory” as well: explaining two other couple tout court.